There’s no feeling the love in the Variety review of fly fishing movie “The River Why.”
The subject of a great deal of legal wrangling, The Rivery Why – which has been making the rounds of indie film festivals in search of a distributor – seems to score points for the beautiful scenery, but loses ground when the characters start cluttering the screen:
The River Why Review – Read Variety’s Analysis Of The Movie The River Why
The Pacific Northwest looks spectacular, but nothing else feels organic about “The River Why.” Based on the cultishly beloved 1983 first novel by David James Duncan (who successfully sued to get his name taken off the pic’s credits), writer-director Matthew Leutwyler’s latest reps a step toward the mainstream after several down-and-dirtier genre exercises (“Unearthed,” “Dead and Breakfast,” “Road Kill”). Unfortunately, he fumbles with a mix of choppy narrative, pretentious verbiage, inspirational coming-of-age cliches and one-dimensional characters that an impressive name cast can’t redeem. Still, that roster should smooth the pic’s path to DVD and tube sales; theatrical prospects are iffy.
…
Frankly, the criticism is in line with other reviews; the movie’s beautifully shot, but the characters are wooden.
No doubt fly fishermen will see it regardless of the reviews (and the reviewer’s later suggestion that Amber Heard’s is too smooth and fit to actually be an outdoor babe suggests he hasn’t spent time around the same outdoorsy types I have), though lacking a distributor, it’s possible they won’t get the chance for some time.
See you in the movie theater, Tom Chandler.




























Recent comments