The Trout Underground Fly Fishing Blog

  • Home
  • Why?
  • Colophon
  • Links
  • Contact

Opinion

Billionaire Oil Money Pops Up In Klamath River Dam Removal Fight?

May 7, 2012, by Tom Chandler 3 comments

Oil Billionaire Money Comes To Klamath River Dam Removal Fight

A recent video attacking Klamath River dam removal in Siskiyou County trotted out all the usual falsehoods (the dams protect salmon, the removal will “devastate” Siskiyou County ranchers, coho aren’t native to the Klamath, yadda yadda…).

Frankly, that’s about par for the course up here.

What is remarkable about the (professionally produced) video can be summed up in two bullet points:

  • At one point, County Supervisor Grace Bennett actually invokes the United Nations (Agenda 21) as one of the reasons the government’s trying to remove the dams
  • Oil billionaire money is now making an appearance in the Klamath dam removal fight

Big Money (And Black Helicopters) Come To Siskiyou County

You can’t help but notice this video was produced by Americans For Prosperity, which turns out not to be a grassroots organization, but a front group for the Koch Brothers.

If you don’t know who the Koch Brothers are, they’re oil company billionaires (Koch Industries is the second-largest privately owned company in the USA), and they’re slowly (and reluctantly) becoming famous for secretly funding disinformation campaigns about climate change. (The New Yorker published an excellent article on the Koch Brothers here.)

In thinly populated Siskiyou County — where campaign signs are often hand-stenciled affairs created in the candidate’s garage — it’s hard to fathom the impact of billionaire oil money on the fight to remove the Klamath Dams

The whole affair has already morphed from a decision about relicensing privately owned dams which will begin losing $20 million year and are extincting salmon populations into a fight against socialist government black helicopter oppression.

It would all make more sense if there wasn’t all this peer-reviewed science suggesting the dams do a lot of damage and very little actual good.

At several points in the video ranchers repeat the claim that they’re the best stewards of the river and the area, yet their plan for preventing coho salmon extinction is to pretend the coho don’t actually exist.

Stellar work, guys.

As a resident of Siskiyou County, I’ve grown used to watching the county drag itself into one bad fight after another while the supervisors generally act like fools, and I can say with some certainty the disinformation that characterizes this fight will flow as freely as before.

It’s just that suddenly, that disinformation is being funded by billionaires with a long history of doing exactly that sort of thing.

See you watching the game change seemingly overnight, Tom Chandler.

Embracing Your Inner Caveman (or, Are Fly Fishermen Reptiles Or Appreciators?)

April 27, 2012, by Tom Chandler 19 comments
The Gears Are Turning at the Underground

It’s no surprise our brains are somewhat modal. We process a lot of information, and despite all the mobile computing/smartphone ads to the contrary, we multitask rather poorly.

The Gears Are Turning at the Underground

Are the gears turning or jammed?

I know that when I’m truly focused on fishing, I’m sunk in an almost reptilian “zog catch fish” mode that drives the rest of the world away.

Yet sometimes I find myself translating the fishing experience into ideas, sentences and paragraphs as it happens — an odd sensation, but one that has become far more common since I started the Underground 6.5 years ago.

The latter “translation” mode delivers less fishing success, but more sentences for the text editor. And a very, very different fishing experience.

It’s likely that some people (notably productive fiction writers) are always in “writer” mode, directly translating their streams of symbols into sentences. Others shift into it.

I wonder if the compelling, directly told experiences of John Gierach suggest he’s always in translation mode (and that he does it well), while the more complex constructs surrounding Leeson’s writing means he fishes now and translates later.

Probably no way to know for sure, and it’s a tough question to ask.

Fav sci-fi writer Walter Jon Williams cops to something similar when he describes his writing process, which involves a translation from symbols into words — a reaction to a writer’s workshop where other writers suggested they thought in sentences (I’d guess Williams is working on a deeper level):

After that I began paying more attention to the way my brain seems to function. When I think, I’m not using a structured, grammatical language, it’s more like I’m laying out a series of Tarot cards. Each card is a symbol, or series of symbols, that stands for a group of concepts or associations. The shape of the array of cards implies a structure and a conclusion. My mind skips from one card to the other without bothering to fill in the grammar that connects them, like a mountain goat bounding from peak to peak without traversing the valleys in between.

I can translate this into English, but it takes a certain amount of effort. I have to add the grammar and explain what the symbols mean. Sometimes my mind gets well ahead of the translation and I stumble to a halt, looking for a word or phrase that got lost. Sometimes I can backtrack and pick up the translation where it stopped; and sometimes I end up totally lost, with people staring at me wondering what the hell I was trying to say.

Most fly fishermen aren’t much concerned with translating their experience into words (though with advent of blogs, that number has grown). For them, achieving “caveman mode” is the most desirable outcome.

The world recedes and the fish come. Simply put, “life good.”

While you’d expect someone’s fly fishing experience to change over the course of 6.5 years, I believe that writing constantly about fly fishing has altered the way I experience the sport.

To Tom the Caveman, the fish are the end result. To Tom the Writer, the goals and the picture are hazier.

Some fishing buddies will tell you I’m pretty intense about fishing for a time. Dave Roberts once remarked that we’d get halfway through a drift boat trip and I’d suddenly straighten up and start looking around, not bored with the process, but not as deeply sunk in it either.

I know that moment, and I think a lot of the fishing reports I’ve filed over the last three years reflect the fact that Tom the Writer/Appreciator is now present as much as Tom the Caveman.

The Changing Caveman

I’ve become more interested in exploring small streams — more interested in what’s around the next bend or how a stretch feels like “home water” — than I am with hoovering every available fish from every available pool.

That’s not to denigrate Tom the Caveman (who could probably stand to bathe more often). Becoming the Caveman is a prerequisite for learning to catch trout, and Tom the Writer’s appreciation for the formerly empty space surrounding the act of fishing is predicated on an ability to catch those fish.

All of this is interesting (at least it was to me as I wrote it), but it also skirts pretty closely to the fly fishing writing abyss: Excessive Navel Gazing.

Which is why I’m halting here, and inviting the Undergrounders to sit back for a minute and try to distinguish between their Caveman and their Appreciator. Given the nature of any population, I’d expect some never remove themselves from Caveman mode, while others essentially live in Appreciator mode.

And for those who flip, how many of you know the moment when it happens?

See you with Zog and the Writer on the river, Tom Chandler.

Your 60 Second Good Deed: Keep California From Misusing Fishing License Dollars

April 11, 2012, by Tom Chandler 1 comment

I haven’t even washed off all the travel dirt — or written my first fully cogent post-return article — yet I’m already flooded with emails detailing environmental/legal emergencies.

Unfortunately, this one needs your attention this morning. So buck up Undergrounders — it will only take a minute (I just did both in one minute — email addresses and sample text included below).

Stop California From Misusing Your Fishing License Dollars

This from Alert Underground Reader Kevin:

Tomorrow, the State Senate’s Budget Subcommittee 2 will move to take at least $1.5 million (maybe as much as $4 million) in fishing license revenues away from fishery programs and use it for Timber Harvest Plan review. This will be the second year that the Senate has tried to do this.

I know that some of you will think that improved timber practices will improve fishing. I don’t disagree, but that’s not the point. THP review should be funded by timber companies, not anglers. If more money is needed for logging oversight, it’s the timber companies that should pay for it.

State fishery programs are already underfunded – the Heritage and Wild Trout Program, for example, doesn’t even have the number of staff that are required by law, we have far fewer wardens than we need and our hatcheries are in pretty dire shape. You name the fishery program – striper research, Lahontan restoration, steelhead habitat improvement – and it will be negatively impacted by the loss of this funding.

Please contact the Subcommittee members and let them know that anglers’ license money is paid to support our fisheries, not subsidize logging companies.

Unfortunately, the hearing is at 2:30 PM today (Wednesday). At this late date, calling their offices is best, but emails are appreciated too.

Sen. Joe Simitian (D-Palo Alto), the chair, supported it before and will likely argue in favor of it. His office line is (916) 651-4011; click here for email.

Sen. Alan Lowenthal (D-Long Beach), supported it last year but is more likely to be swayed than Simitian. His office line is (916) 651-4027; click here for email.

It won’t hurt to contact the Dept. of Fish and Game, as they’ll be testifying at this hearing. Last year, DFG didn’t fight this move. You can call the Director’s office at (916) 653-4633.

Sample Email

Dear XXX:

I’m writing in opposition to the Senate’s Budget Subcommittee’s attempt to take at least $1.5 million in fishing license revenues away from fishery programs and use it for Timber Harvest Plan review.

While I’m all for improved timber harvest practices and better Timber Harvest Plan reviews, it’s common sense they should be paid for by timber companies, not funded by fishing license revenues.

State fishery programs are already underfunded, and this makes that worse.

For example, The Heritage and Wild Trout Program does not support the number of staff that are required by law. We also have far fewer wardens than we need and our hatcheries are in pretty dire shape. Every fishery program will be negatively impacted by the loss of this funding.

Make timber companies pay for their own impacts; leave our fishery money alone.

Respectfully,
XXXX

A Little Good News

There’s also a little good news too; a bill that makes it easier to improve habitat for Coho salmon (it eases restrictions on improvement projects for landowners and others) cleared committee yesterday without comment. A big hurdle cleared.

See, it’s not all slogging…

See you catching up, Tom Chandler.

A Few Thoughts On Fly Fishing Video (And Selling Out, Cheaply)

March 13, 2012, by Tom Chandler 35 comments
Fly Fishing Film Tour Whiskey

How Do Fly Fishing Videos Fit Into The Fly Fishing Media Landscape?

Once again, the Fly Fishing Film Tour (F3T) runs a master class in generating a little blogger PR:

Fly Fishing Film Tour Whiskey

Bought, and perhaps even cheaply. Now for the thinking...


 
After acknowledging that I’ve been bought and paid for (and cheaply too), I’d urge you to watch the F3T show in Larkspur (Marin) on March 20, but apparently it’s already sold out.

Turns out I can’t even do the blogger sellout thing all that well.

I can, however, still write.

The Video Phenomenon

Today’s filmmakers can shoot, edit and distribute a video with relative ease, and since I’m all for a more democratic media landscape, I’ll label that as “awesome.”

Some of the videos are even pretty damned good.

And then some of them aren’t, and I can’t help but compare the burgeoning fly fishing video landscape to the burgeoning fly fishing blog landscape.

You’ll find some good stuff and not so good stuff, and at some point, you recognize who has insight and who has… well, access to a blog or video camera.

An informal survey suggests fish porn has so far dominated the fly fishing video category, and that has yet to hold my interest for more than a few minutes (the same is true of exotic destination stories in magazines).

Sometimes the imagery makes up for the lack of story or insight, but mostly not.

It’s one reason I’ve given up reviewing videos; the vast majority are disqualified right out of the box, which isn’t the best starting point for a reviewer — especially one prone to turning off the soundtrack so I know what the video looks like sans the rock & roll crutch.

I frequently discover some videos are more impressive for pirating the Rolling Stones than they are for their imagery.

Wanted: A Story

I’m a writer and a reader, so it’s no surprise I’m attracted to videos that trace an arc: an escalating insight, an interesting character, or even a conflict.

Watching a steady stream of guys yanking an indicator upward doesn’t provide that.

Unsurprisingly, the same is true for a lot of written fishing reports, how-to articles and destination pieces (I predict the fish porn video will ultimately replace the written destination article).

I think it’s why I’ve become an unrepentant Steve Apple groupie; his Hustle & Fish movie was ultimately schizophrenic, but the first half was brilliant satire, and it contained a story that kept me riveted instead of wondering what else I should be doing.

Twice I’ve told fly fishing manufacturers to seek Apple out and pay him to produce something witty and brilliant (instead of throwing money at pretty pictures in return for a logo flash in the credits), but no dice.

Meanwhile, the Fly Fishing Film Tour is selling out and fly fishermen love the videos and the music and the beer, and like Gierach, I understand what’s happening and even approve, but it’s not exactly my scene.

It’s clearly a phenomenon, demonstrated in part by the torrent of requests to “promote” videos on the Trout Underground.

Which highlights one of the differences between blogs and videos; good videomakers create fans, while good bloggers create audiences, and for that reason I keep forecasting the collision of videos, ezines and blogs.

Which hasn’t really happened. It wouldn’t be the first time I was wrong.

Naturally, the Undergrounders are encouraged to weigh in with fly fishing video-related insights which the rest of us will judge and even openly ridicule.

See you in the Underground’s 25-seat home theater (right next to the bowling alley), Tom Chandler.

Why Grandpa Looks Unhappy (And Why I’m About To Log A Lot Of Flight Time)

March 11, 2012, by Tom Chandler 43 comments
Meskerem Swift Chandler

In the checkout line, I told Little M (my three year-old daughter) we weren’t buying ice cream for dinner because she already had some after lunch, which was when the checkout lady sorta killed the conversation by saying:

“Aw come on, Grandpa. Have a heart.”

Ouch.

I don’t know if I’m necessarily heartless, but after that, I can say my ass stings a little.

Most days, that’s just a funny story. This week, it’s an omen.

You see, we got The Call.

On April 5, the L&T and I are due to appear before the Ethiopian High Court, setting into motion the formal adoption of our daughter’s little sister.

Or, Grandpa, it’s time to get your shit together.

A Tale Of Two Sisters

For those who aren’t up to speed, the L&T and I adopted Little M from Ethiopia several years ago, and despite the fact she’s a great kid, I’d have told you one was enough.

Late last summer, a surprise afternoon phone call revealed Little M had a little sister on the verge of adoption elsewhere (mistakenly, since Ethiopia wants siblings placed together if possible), and that we had twelve hours to decide what to do about that.

Given the value of a flesh & blood sister to an international adoptee, it wasn’t a lengthy decision (though it wasn’t an easy one either).

A little math suggests I’ll be at retirement age when I’m teaching M2 to drive (which shouldn’t kill me) and just a bit older when she heads off to college and starts dating slacker rage haiku poets (which probably will).

Learning To Fly

So on April 1 — after filling out a lot of forms and several (more) alarmingly big checks — we’re flying to Ethiopia.

There we’ll meet M2 (my clever code name for Little M’s sister), stand up in front of a court conducted in a language we don’t understand, and then fly home.

Eight weeks later we fly back, gather up M2, and fly her back to meet the sister she would never have known, who is really into practicing the older sister thing (bossing people around).

I hope M2′s at least a little like her older sister, who is bright and happy and draws people to her like honey draws bees.

Little M has learned a lot in her time here, like Wally will always lick her face if given the chance, and that the really interesting stuff (like ice cream) is kept on the third shelf of the freezer, but more importantly, she’s learned to trust us.

How, I don’t know.

During her first year of life, she watched one adult after another walk away — and suffered more privation in that time than I have in my entire life.

Yet she’s fearless and athletic and climbs anything taller than she is, and without warning, she’ll leap out into space, trusting that her parents will catch her as she tumbles from orbit.

It’s a lesson for a sometimes-cynical dad who is a lot closer to crawling than flying when it comes to the faith in humanity department.

I don’t know what lessons M2 holds for me, though if she spoke English instead of Amharic, I suspect one of them might run along these lines:

“Come on Grandpa, it’s time to learn to fly.”

See you in the air, Tom Chandler.

Why Your Kid’s Kids May Not Fish For Salmon in California

March 5, 2012, by Tom Chandler 13 comments

The California Water Blog is written by actual scientists who know more about California’s trout, salmon and steelhead than pretty much anyone on the planet, so when they post something definitive, you’re smart to sit up and take notice.

Like these  on the insanity of California’s fragmented salmon & water management:

The past 60 years of Central Valley hatchery production to support fisheries has resulted in replacement of multiple natural populations with one hatchery population, thereby greatly increasing extinction risk.

The situation is similar to managing financial investments for long-term yields, where a well-diversified investment portfolio (i.e., multiple runs with multiple independent populations) will fluctuate less in response to volatile market conditions (i.e., environmental variation) than will one concentrated in just one or two stocks (i.e., just hatchery fish).

Today, the management portfolio of Central Valley salmon is overwhelmingly concentrated in hatchery production. This all-eggs-in-one-basket strategy is an underlying cause of the recent collapse of salmon numbers (Lindley et al. 2009). Recovery of self-sustaining runs of Central Valley salmon will be impossible if we do not stop interbreeding between hatchery and naturally spawning populations (Katz et al. 2012).

There it is. Plain as day.

Biologists are often reluctant to make statements that will play in the political arena; it’s far safer to simply state the hatchery salmon aren’t as productive as wild salmon, and that releasing vast numbers of them suppresses wild populations.

Here, Moyle and Katz lay it all out for us; recovery will be impossible as long as rubber trout (and habitat loss, and massive delta pumping, and whatever else) continue to gum up the works.

But that would be a commercial disaster, right? All those fish that commercial salmon fishermen couldn’t catch?

Well, don’t look to closely, but commercial salmon fishermen haven’t been doing too good since about 2006 or so.

What’s needed to get California’s salmon populations back on track? Lots of things, starting with:

Because of the fragmented nature of the current system of salmon management, we spend tens of millions of dollars annually to produce salmon in inland hatcheries, and then spend hundreds of millions more to deal with the environmental, regulatory and legal consequences of having produced those same fish.

As was suggested for water management in the previous blog, this piecemeal approach to fisheries resource management is not economically viable. Nor is this strategy viable for avoiding extinction. Accordingly, a comprehensive re-thinking of hatchery management must be undertaken in California and where adverse impacts to natural spawning populations outweigh benefits, hatcheries should be closed.

See you eating all the hatchery fish I can catch, Tom Chandler.

 

Siskiyou County Politics & Klamath Dam Removal: A Comedy Dream Team?

February 16, 2012, by Tom Chandler 25 comments
Shasta River Chinook Salmon

While Siskiyou County ranks pretty far down the list of California counties in terms of economic output, its comedic potential remains unchallenged.

For some time, I’ve been trying to write a comprehensive piece about river access, dam removal and salmon recovery in Siskiyou County — and the vicious, detached-from-reality politics surrounding them — but it’s like trying to drink from a fire hose pumping “crazy” instead of water.

Instead, I decided to feed the Undergrounders the crazy in bite-sized chunks, starting with today’s post, which amounts to a singular appetizer: A Bold, Constitutionally Based Declaration From An Angry Voter That Just Happens To Be Wholly Wrong.

(Warning: those with nut allergies or an aversion to constitutional abuse may want to stop reading.)

Today’s nugget comes to us in a letter to the editor to the Siskiyou Daily News, where the writer takes a bold new tack in challenging the removal of the Klamath River dams.

Ownership.

You, as representatives of We The People, need to first fulfill your obligations to the U.S. Constitution that you all took an oath of office to uphold. As public servants, you are to uphold the constitutional rights of We The People, which includes the people of Siskiyou County, California. Not serve special interest groups.

As for the removal of dams within the borders of Siskiyou County, you will have to prove to us, the people of Siskiyou County, proof of private ownership of these dams by Pacific Corp. We are demanding the notarized Deed of Trust proving such ownership.

Wow. I never saw that one coming. But why is dam ownership even in question? He continues:

For the background of the dams within Siskiyou County, they were originally built within hard economic times by the Bureau of Reclamation to help create employment and produce power for the communities within our county.

Frankly, it gets better (see below), but one little tiny fact kinda ruins things early.

The dams weren’t built by the Bureau of Reclamation (this direct from the Bureau).

They were privately built and are privately owned.

Shasta River Chinook Salmon

The funny fish: A Shasta River salmon

Oh.

This is important because some people are wondering why Siskiyou County is trying to force a private company (PacifiCorp) to retain private structures which it no longer wants — dams which will require $450 million to retrofit to existing standards, and will then operate at a $20 million annual loss.

It’s an odd stance to be taken by a county government riddled with property rights extremists.

In fact, an objective observer might suggest it was a fairly socialist act [Gasp, Commies!].

You might dismiss this letter as the work of a single, factually challenged individual, but it’s not; it’s a “fact” that is rapidly gaining traction in this county, uttered by people who will also tell you — with a straight face — that the endangered Coho Salmon isn’t native to the Klamath watershed, so its ESA listing is unconstitutional (we’ll mine that rich comedy vein soon).

In other words, there are damned few facts supporting the dams, but in Siskiyou County, that’s when the real patriots stand up and start inventing their own.

After his early stumble, our letter writer keeps blasting away at shadows, using lots of Clearly Important Capitalized Words for ammo:

Public property belongs to We The People of the United States of America. Public property within Siskiyou County is under control of We The People of Siskiyou County. We are now taking it back.

Siskiyou County voted “no” on dam removal. Our dams will not be removed! That is our choice, not yours!

Siskiyou County public property is protected by our Siskiyou County Sheriff-Coroner Jon Lopey. He is an elected public official; a public servant. Yes, he will do his job and protect the rights of the citizens of Siskiyou County.

Now any state or federal agent coming to the dams within Siskiyou County will need to ask our sheriff-coroner’s permission.

Notice how “public” property isn’t really public, unless your concept of “public” extends only to the residents of this county (and it’s pretty clear the residents of the southern end don’t really count).

Also note the reliance on Sheriff Lopey to protect us from the meanies, despite the fact that county governments are extensions of the state government, and that state and federal “agents” have every right to enter this county without his permission.

Coming soon: Navigability and Is the Coho native?

See you in the comedy zone, Tom Chandler.

What Russell Chatham’s “The Angler’s Coast” Really Teaches Us

January 30, 2012, by Tom Chandler 8 comments

An Undergrounder sent me an old hardback copy of Russell Chatham’s The Angler’s Coast, and while the writing is evocative and the stories interesting, the most intriguing aspect of the book was its look at fisheries that — in many cases — no longer exist.

Chatham was something of a fly fishing bum and the stories reflect it (he’ll fish almost anywhere for anything), but a modern fly fisherman can’t help but sit up and notice when Chatham tells us Bill Schaadt caught between 800 and 900 steelhead on the Russian River in 1956, yet when the book was written (the early 1970s), Schaadt would have counted himself lucky to land twenty.

What would that number be today?

In other words, the steelhead hasn’t always been the “fish of a thousands casts” and it’s interesting too see how its scarcity has created a folklore that isn’t — historically speaking — true.

Time adds weight to some written works (Swift’s A Modest Proposal is a shining example), and I’d recommend The Angler’s Coast to any newer fly fisherman (especially those in California) who wonders why so many are fighting so hard to restore our still-declining steelhead and salmon runs.

As someone who started fishing in the mid-70s and graduated from high school in 1979, Chatham’s stories about the west’s fisheries fall just outside my grasp; they overlap my childhood but were largely gone before I was old enough to notice, leaving me with the impression of something I should remember, but can’t.

The book was written four decades ago and things have largely gotten worse instead of better, and while it’s not a weepy recounting of what we lost, it is a robust set of stories about the very tail end of the losing, and perhaps an incentive to do the things it will take to recover at least a fraction of what have become the West Coast’s version of the buffalo.

See you in the stacks, Tom Chandler.

An Underground Primer on Phone Etiquette For Fly Fishermen

April 15, 2011, by Tom Chandler 7 comments

Fly fishing’s off season doesn’t represent the end of anything as much as it does a shift; instead of talking on the river, your little group of fly fishermen hold those same conversations on the phone.

And as the winter slowly closes out, those phone calls turn to spring.

Naturally, there’s an unspoken etiquette when discussing the upcoming fly fishing season – especially when that season involves a record 170% of normal snowpack and a forecast for a cooler-than-normal spring.

First, you don’t come right out and admit the obvious: You’re screwed.

That’s considered poor form.

Instead, you’re encouraged to speculate wildly about best-case scenarios, often couching your speculation in experience: “The snowpack was higher in ought-whatever” we’ll say, “but we were still fishing by the Fourth of July.”

Of course, the snowpack wasn’t higher in ought-whatever, and plenty of years the river was still unhappily elevated by the Fourth of July.

But you don’t say that out loud. That way lies insanity.

Instead, you dance around the subject, but slowly — because you’re not blind to reality — the evidence builds.

Record snowpack. Cold spring (the temperature is 15 degrees lower than “normal” for this time of year).

High water.

Lots and lots of split shot.

Thus concludes the discovery portion of the phone call (over the past two days, I went through this with both Wayne Eng and Steven Bertrand).

Then we move into the Adaptation phase.

Wayne, ever the optimist, suggested we’d just have to look for the right spots on the river, which will become difficult to fish just as soon as water starts spilling over the Box Canyon dam at Lake Siskiyou.

Bertrand – who is not so optimistic – suggested trips to reservoirs and tailwaters, which set off a whole new round of speculation about what happens to the Lower McCloud and McCloud Reservoir once that 170% snowpack hits Mud Creek.

Even with the Optimist setting turned up to 11, we quickly started running out of fishable water.

I even essayed a classic backcountry gambit, where I suggested I’d be able to fish a couple of my alpine streams as early as late May or June, which is total bullshit.

Bertrand noted that we normally fish those places by May or June, and this year wasn’t normal, which forced me to fall back on my “I’ll snowshoe or ski in” fantasy.

That works if you ignore the fact that you’d ski many, many miles one way, only find a creek over its banks.

In other words, it works not at all.

We did isolate on small creek that might be fishable before the others, and because you don’t want to find other people there, you speak its name sparingly on the phone (apparently out of fear the NSA is populated with fly fishermen).

The Lower Sac? The Rogue? There will be fly fishing, though it’ll likely involve some travel or AA sized split shot or sheer luck.

And naturally, you’ll occasionally encounter a spoiler; while I was writing this, Dave Roberts called to reveal he’d spent yesterday in a snowstorm on the Henry’s Fork, catching trout during a heavy BWO hatch.

You simultaneously curse him for the taunt, but quietly thank him for restoring some hope.

Now if only you could afford the gas.

See you working the phone bank, Tom Chandler

Why I Don’t Let Wally The Wonderdog Talk to Reporters (or, Define Fly Fishing In 10 Seconds or Less…)

April 7, 2011, by Tom Chandler 25 comments

How Do You Sell A Sport You Can’t Define?

Earlier this week, a reporter called to write an article about the Trout Underground, and just as the conversation started, Wally the Wonderdog wandered slowly past my office window — holding a stiffly frozen, snow-encrusted squirrel in his mouth.

I considered telling the reporter about the squirrel-cicle, but then realized it really wasn’t that believable; the kind of thing a guy would make up to impress a reporter.

Moments like this force me to realize that much of the Underground’s universe — especially the bits concerning Wally the Wonderdog — simply aren’t fit for print.

Or maybe they’re just not readily explainable.

And that was only the start of the interview. It wasn’t long before he asked the inevitable, grind-my-brain-to-halt question:

“What is the Trout Underground?”

And, like every other time I’ve been asked, I had no answer — at least nothing that glibly approaches a sound bite (outside of the ill-advised “I’m simply oversharing my mental illness”).

Part of the problem lies with the sport itself; beyond the gear used (and that’s up for grabs these days), fly fishing is pretty hard to define.

Even Gierach — who writes far more gooder than I — refuses to be cornered:

“Fly-fishing is solitary, contemplative, misanthropic, scientific in some hands, poetic in others, and laced with conflicting aesthetic considerations. It’s not even clear if catching fish is actually the point.”

It gets worse.

A quick survey of the Internet suggests catching fish actually is the point fly fishing, but for some (an awful lot, actually), it clearly isn’t.

Others accumulate fly fishing gear and clearly think that’s the point, while others embrace minimalism as the One True Path to Heaven.

For others, it’s all about being miserable, and reminding everyone just how tough they are to withstand the suffering, or…

You get the picture.

Recruiting new people to the sport has never proved all that easy, with some quick to point to things like the high cost of equipment (ever compared the cost of a fly rod & reel to a bass boat?), the notorious stuffiness of the sport’s practitioners, surly fly shop employees, the fussiness (and shrinking habitat) of trout, the technical demands of casting, etc.

Here’s a thought; maybe it has nothing to do with any of the above.

Maybe it’s hard to sell a sport that you can’t really define.

Unlike tournament bass fishing (or golf, or whatever), fly fishing’s goals are a little unclear, and for some of us, they shift over the course of a day.

Which is a long-winded way of making myself feel better about an inability to clearly define the blog I’ve been writing for better than 720,000 words, especially after the reporter asked me to pick a couple of highlights (posts) from the prior year.

I ended up picking three posts that felt like they represented the blog, then realized that one was definitely not about fly fishing, and two that were about fly fishing kinda dealt with it in the periphery (OK, they were all about Little M, though fly fishing featured heavily in this one and here).

A sport with shifting goals? Blogs with no visible point? An writer’s inability to summarize 720,000 words of his own work?

Frankly, it’s enough to make me want to wander off and find a beer.

Maybe watch Wally the Wonderdog eat his squirrel-cicle.

Right now, that makes perfect sense.

See you outside, Tom Chandler.

123Next ›Last »

Paying the Bills

Allen Fly Fishing

Follow us

FacebookTwitterRSS feed

Recent comments

  • Tom Chandler: With 57 days to go, he's about a quarter of...
  • Kevin: IN. I hope he meets his goal. A book of...
  • FlyLink: Yosemite is a great place to fly fish, you just...
  • David: I think Kickstarter seems like a great idea. I hope...
  • Tom Chandler: And there is no truth to the rumors that I'm...
  • Kevin: I definitely saw some insects the size of hummingbirds yesterday....

What I Said

  • Weekly Short Casts for 2012-05-24
  • It's not all river porn...Local Photographer, Fly Fishing Guide Kickstarts McCloud River Photo Book
  • Your Monday Morning Yosemite Water Porn
  • The Upper Sacramento Is Falling Fast (And A Note About Stoneflies)
  • Mattias AdolfssonSuddenly That Drift Boat Isn’t Looking So Good To You…

Short Casts

  • Fly rods now so expensive, people setting up fake online magazines to con manufactures out of a few: http://t.co/AkSioBJl 4 hrs ago
  • Surprise! Pebble Mine toxic containment a virtual certainty to fail: http://t.co/KZubicT4 11 hrs ago
  • The Really Shitty Outdoor Apocalypse: Bear attacks man while he was in an outhouse: http://t.co/59Suwzih 23 hrs ago
  • i conducted an interview with Mikey Wier -- well-known fly fishing videographer and recent CalTrout hire: http://t.co/kZGjjCDn 2 days ago
  • RT @FantasyContest: Guys you MUST read this meltdown from a self-pub author over on our sister site @FantasyFaction http://t.co/0m8EqD4G 3 days ago
  • More Outdoor Apocalypse - man breaks into hatchery, steals trout, leaves picture on surveillance camera: http://t.co/Ji0S7sOP 3 days ago
  • More updates...

Powered by Twitter Tools

RSS Singlebarbed’s Crazy, But…

  • Economics as defined by Candy bars, not fly tackle
  • Where we find more ways for you to use butt ends and random clippings
  • A groundskeeper uniform with rod taped to the shaft of my edger
  • Rod making economics explained using Kentucky Windage

RSS California Trout

  • The Eastern Sierra Update: Golden Trout and the Mammoth Watershed
  • CalTrout A Part Of Native Species Restoration In Malibu
  • CalTrout Fundraising Gala Another Big Success
  • CalTrout Making Waves on North Coast’s Eel River

RSS My Writing blog

  • Retrobrilliance: Rumpus Fires Up “Letters In The Mail” Subscription Service
  • Working Writers: Paul Lagasse
  • The Pitch “Reality” TV Show About Advertising Pulls… A 0.0 Rating…
  • Weekly Tweetfest

Categories

Random Acts of Advertising

We Disclaim

The opinions expressed on the Underground don't reflect the views of my clients, friends, or even people I meet at the Post Office. I'm sure I can be bought, just not at today's prices.

Runs On

Ubuntu Linux OS
WordPress

Reading List

Recent Reading

Ready Player One
Prayers on the Wind
In the Beginning...was the Command Line
Frankensteins and Foreign Devils
Robert B. Parker's Killing the Blues
Fever Pitch
High Fidelity
Reamde
Where the Hell Am I? Trips I Have Survived
Moneyball: The Art of Winning an Unfair Game
On Writing Well: The Classic Guide to Writing Nonfiction
Juliet, Naked
Your Idea Machine
Days of Atonement
Hush Money
Writing the Pilot
The Nasty Little Writing Book : Longtime New York Publishing Insider Reveals Secrets Only Best-Selling Authors Know
The Writing Life
The Wave: In Pursuit of the Rogues, Freaks, and Giants of the Ocean
Bass Wars: A Story of Fishing Fame and Fortune


Tom Chandler's favorite books »
}

Tags

affta bamboo fly rod bamboo fly rods bottled water brown trout california water wars caltrout fiberglass fly rod fishing Fishing Report Fly Fishing fly fishing gear fly fishing industry fly fishing montana fly fishing small streams fly fishing the upper sacramento fly fishing the upper sacramento river fly fishing video fly rod fly rods Fly Tying john gierach Klamath River maine mccloud mccloud river montana Nestle october caddis orvis outdoors rainbow trout Road Trip salmon salmon recovery singlebarbed steelhead ted williams trout trout underground trout unlimited upper sac Upper Sacramento upper sacramento river wally the wonderdog
Copyright © 2011 The Trout Underground. All Rights Reserved, so you kids better get off my lawn.