An earlier post detailed Orvis’ opposition to Vermont Fish & Wildlife plans to stock sterile rainbow trout on the Batten Kill River, and generated some interesting comments.
Orvis – whose conservation arm had raised $100,000 for Batten Kill habitat restoration work – threatened to pull out of the project if the state stocked the river (one of the five remaining “wild” trout fisheries in Vermont) with rainbow trout, effectively creating a put-and-take fishery.

Habitat restoration includes returning woody debris to the river (Orvis photo).
According to a Vermont TV station’s Web site, Vermont Fish and Wildlife Commissioner Wayne Laroche said the agency would bow to public pressure and abandon the stocking plans.
[sfx: deep sigh of relief]
Meanwhile, Back at the Batten Kill
A five-year study of the Batten Kill suggested that too many of the in-river debris had been cleared away (a common by-product of development), and the reduction in cover had resulted in lower fish populations and marginal habitat.
Orvis took the lead in raising funds to restore the habitat with the hopes that trout populations would rebound on their own once the habitat improved.

Close up of the restoration work on the Batten Kill. I’m ready to fish it. (Orvis photo)
Adding more fish to an already-stressed river wasn’t a very good idea, and I wonder if the strong public response wasn’t manifestation of a fear that the Batten Kill would be managed as a put-and-take fishery even after fish populations had rebounded.
With so many waters in the state of Vermont already allowing catch and kill – and only five manged on a sustainable “wild fish” model – it’s not hard to understand the public response, which ran four-to-one against stocking at a recent public meeting.
It’s a marvelous Monday on the Underground.
[tags]Battenkill, Batten Kill, resoration, Orvis, Vermont[/tags]
Recent comments