<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Trout Underground Fly Fishing Blog &#187; mccloud river</title>
	<link>http://troutunderground.com</link>
	<description>Fly Fishing the Upper Sacramento River : Tom Chandler's Fly Fishing Life : Fly Rods are the Measure of Life</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 21:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>McCloud Flow Information: Rumor Has it River is Dirty</title>
		<link>http://troutunderground.com/2008/05/08/mccloud-flow-information-rumor-has-it-river-is-dirty/</link>
		<comments>http://troutunderground.com/2008/05/08/mccloud-flow-information-rumor-has-it-river-is-dirty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 17:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom Chandler</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[mccloud river]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[pg&amp;e flow testing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://troutunderground.com/2008/05/08/mccloud-flow-information-rumor-has-it-river-is-dirty/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More than one guide has passed along information that the Lower McCloud &#8212; the subject of flow control testing by PG&#38;E &#8212; is a &#34;muddy mess.&#34; 
Any onsite reports from the Undergrounders?
Right now, projected McCloud River flows (at Ah Di Nah) should be 800 cfs.
They&#8217;ll hold through Saturday. Sunday they&#8217;ll be bumped to 1000 cfs [...]
<script type="text/javascript">
SHARETHIS.addEntry(
	{
	title: "McCloud Flow Information: Rumor Has it River is Dirty",
	url: "http://troutunderground.com/2008/05/08/mccloud-flow-information-rumor-has-it-river-is-dirty/"
	}
	
	
);
</script>
	]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More than one guide has passed along information that the Lower McCloud &#8212; the subject of flow control testing by PG&amp;E &#8212; is a &quot;muddy mess.&quot; </p>
<p>Any onsite reports from the Undergrounders?</p>
<p>Right now, projected McCloud River flows (at Ah Di Nah) should be 800 cfs.</p>
<p>They&#8217;ll hold through Saturday. Sunday they&#8217;ll be bumped to 1000 cfs (which could be wild), and will remain there through Tuesday (600 Wednesday), then back to &quot;normal.&quot;</p>
<p>The McCloud might not be your best bet this weekend, and with the Upper Sac bumping up past 2000 cfs, that&#8217;s not looking so great either. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll be in the Bay Area, but for the sake of those looking to catch some trout, any ideas from the Undergrounders?</p>
<p>See you in the big city, Tom Chandler.</p>
<div class="wlWriterSmartContent" id="scid:0767317B-992E-4b12-91E0-4F059A8CECA8:f7ce51ba-470c-4ad0-8933-9d97f303f20b" style="padding-right: 0px; display: inline; padding-left: 0px; padding-bottom: 0px; margin: 0px; padding-top: 0px">Technorati Tags: <a href="http://technorati.com/tags/mccloud%20river" rel="tag">mccloud river</a>,<a href="http://technorati.com/tags/pg&amp;e%20flow%20testing" rel="tag">pg&amp;e flow testing</a></div>
<p><a href="http://sharethis.com/item?&wp=2.3.2&amp;publisher=276277c8-8e35-4cde-a11a-bdd729f9d206&amp;title=McCloud+Flow+Information%3A+Rumor+Has+it+River+is+Dirty&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Ftroutunderground.com%2F2008%2F05%2F08%2Fmccloud-flow-information-rumor-has-it-river-is-dirty%2F">ShareThis</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://troutunderground.com/2008/05/08/mccloud-flow-information-rumor-has-it-river-is-dirty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
