Environment,    hatchery salmon,    hatchery steelhead,    News,    wild salmon,    wild steelhead

More Proof: Hatchery Salmon & Steelhead Actually Damaging Wild Fish Populations

By Tom Chandler 1/3/2012

Another study supports the fact that hatchery salmon and steelhead experience relatively dismal survival rates in the wild -- more ammunition for advocates for wild fish (and often, dam removal).

Salmon born in captivity become domesticated in as little as one generation, a new study finds, explaining why hatchery-born fish don't do as well as wild-born ones in Oregon rivers.

Researchers created an enormous fish family tree using genetic samples from 12,700 steelhead trout (which are in the same family as salmon) returning from the sea to Oregon's Hood River to spawn. This fishy pedigree revealed the fish that spawned well in hatcheries had offspring that spawned poorly in the wild.

Later, the article quoted a steelhead hatchery fish survival rate only 80% that of wild fish. And the concern is that "hatchery" genes -- which result in higher reproduction in hatcheries, but far lower reproduction in the wild -- would suppress natural steelhead populations.

In other words, wild fish good, hatchery fish bad. On a lot of levels.

The article makes some intersting points, and is well worth a read.

AuthorPicture

Tom Chandler

As the author of the decade leading fly fishing blog Trout Underground, Tom believes that fishing is not about measuring the experience but instead of about having fun. As a staunch environmentalist, he brings to the Yobi Community thought leadership on environmental and access issues facing us today.

[...] More Proof: Hatchery Salmon & Steelhead actually damaging wild fish populations [...]
0
0
Thank you Mark. "Mind your science" is so simple, but so profound. This would be an apt theme for a lot of environmental issues. Thanks Tom for the story. We face these issues in Sacramento with our own hatchery. The fish have made a comeback this year in our river. Only it is not. There is still just a fraction of what used to swim in our rivers. I now think the whole hatchery idea is doomed.
0
0
It's about genetic selectivity. Small egg sizes and other hatchery selected traits suck in the wild. Montana stopped stocking hatchery trout in the 70's. Generally, you don't want to be beat by MT when it comes to progressive ideas but this time it happened. We have good fishing for a reason! Mind your science.
0
0
In many cases, the number of hatchery fish released far outnumber the wild stocks, so even at reduced levels of productivity, they still pose a significant threat. Plus, despite reduced productivity, hatchery fish -- who have been "selected" to thrive in hatchery conditions, not the wild -- will still spawn with wild fish, with a corresponding negative effect on wild genes. This stuff is pretty well ... more documented; what's interesting is how quickly it happens.
0
0
I'm simple-minded, but if hatchery fish won't reproduce well in the wild --- doesn't that imply they're little threat to wild stocks? Seems like the worse problem is the invasive fish that do thrive in the wild.
0
0

Discover Your Own Fishing and Hunting Adventures

With top destinations, guided trips, outfitters and guides, and river reports, you have everything you need.