If you have an extra 30 seconds (and even if you don’t), do Klamath River steelhead and salmon a favor and click here, copy and paste the “sample” comment you’ll find below (or write your own), and leave a public comment in support of the Klamath EIS/EIR Alternative 2 (complete removal of the four lower Klamath River dams).
That’s the short version of this post.
The Longer Version
The four lower Klamath River dams (which are currently throttling the salmon and steelhead populations on what used to be the west coast’s third-most productive salmon fishery) are not only bad for fish, it turns out they’re bad for the economy.
The owner of the dams (PacifiCorp) is in the midst of a FERC relicensing, and if they were to update the dams with fish ladders (as would be required), they’d operate at a $20 million annual loss.
If taken out, they’d:
- Create 4600 jobs
- Provide an estimated 86% bump in Chinook salmon populations
- Open up an additional 300-400 miles of spawning habitat to salmon and steelhead
- Make my day
In literally thirty seconds, you can help us take them out. This isn’t some pie-in-the-sky thing — we’ve got a fair to good chance to make this happen, though it’s going to require putting pressure on legislators over the next couple years.
Still, you want to know how easy this comment will be?
Here’s a picture of the form (click it to go to the real form):
And here’s your cut and paste comment:
Subject: Klamath Draft EIS/EIR: I support Alternative 2
Comment: I support Alternative 2 of the Klamath Draft EIS/EIR proposal (full removal of the Iron Gate, Copco1, Copco2, and J.C. Boyle dams).
- These dams are decimating one of the west’s most prolific salmon and steelhead fisheries and strangling the area’s economy
- Alternative 2 will help restore salmon runs (dramatically increasing steelhead populations), and ensure predictable water deliveries to irrigators
- The dams don’t make economic sense: if upgraded to modern standards they’ll actually operate at a $20 million annual loss
- Even the owner (PacifiCorp) wants these privately owned dams taken out
I support healthy fisheries and a healthy local economy (dam removal brings many jobs to the area) — and I support Alternative 2.
Thank you,
[your name]
****************************************
I try not to bombard you guys with a lot of “Save The World” stuff but the Klamath River dams issue is about to hit a series of critical moments.
At stake is the future of what used to be one of the west coast’s best salmon rivers (and let’s not forget the steelhead fishery, which is good, but could become stellar).
With a little more water and a little less dams, the Klamath could become a wholly kickass salmon and steelhead fishery (again).
Want More Information?
For an executive summary of the Klamath River dam removal Draft EIS/EIR, click here.
For more information about the Klamath River Basin Restoration Agreement (KBRA) and other Klamath Issues, click here.





























Think I did it, but did not receive a confirmation. Maybe I’ll try again.
Kentucky Jim(Quote)
Did it a second time. No confirmation, but a screen change to draft EIR. Maybe they got it.
Kentucky Jim(Quote)
Oh, and btw, Happy Veterans’ Day!
Kentucky Jim(Quote)
I didn’t get a confirmation either (did it twice), but I’m assuming it went through.
I mean, it’s a government website, there’s no way they could foul that up…
Tom Chandler(Quote)
No confirmation for me either. That is a bit suspicious since they now have plausible deniability that they received any comments…
Matt S(Quote)
Done
Steve Z(Quote)
I did it twice too. Hopefully they received it…
Brian(Quote)
More than support for the EIS’ plan, what would really push dam-busting forward is support by the region’s congressional representative.
Good luck with Wally Herger.
trotsky(Quote)
Good point, though given that Herger’s an empty suit who keeps getting elected despite doing nothing to help this area, I’m counting on the following from him: Nothing.
Tom Chandler(Quote)
Given the very conservative nature of this region overall it’s no wonder Herger keeps getting re-elected….
Brian(Quote)
True, but outside of mouthing the right platitudes, he doesn’t really do much for the conservatives either.
Tom Chandler(Quote)
Thank for sharing this. Done. Here’s to hoping for the best.
Carl(Quote)
Done.
professor(Quote)
Done…please vote and help the salmon!
lunar fish(Quote)
Done, forward the link to others with a courtesy note. Many in my area are anti removal suspecting higher electical rates. Hope I live long enough to see fish return to the Klamath area. tw
Waterouzel(Quote)
Thanks. Given that the dams would run at a $20 million annual loss if retained, removal will mean lower rates in the long run.
Tom Chandler(Quote)
Tom,
Dam removal will always be surrounded in myths and half truths, defending dam removal almost always winds me up in a food fight with both family and fellow workers. I was on the Upper Rogue several weeks ago to get in some last licks with the Summer Run Steelies, and guess what? I ran into a bunch more fall salmon spawning this year! Hummm… I wonder if this is related to removal of Gold Ray and Savage Rapids? Could it be that a stream will rehabilitate if some intelligent decisions are implemented….I better stop, my head may explode.
Waterouzel(Quote)