The Underground’s never really surprised when the Siskiyou County Board of Supervisors drags the rest of the county into the mud alongside them – and normally I don’t bother the Undergrounders with something this local – but this one might affect you (at least a few years down the road).
Right now, the Klamath River is sick as hell. Every summer, the river below two of its reservoirs runs bright green with toxic algae, and while I could write a good fifteen paragraphs of text outlining the latest move on the part of the Siskiyou County Board of Supervisors to keep it that way (Measure G), but rather than bore the Undergrounders as a whole (99% of whom won’t get to vote on this subject), let me just say this to my Siskiyou County readers:
Vote “Yes” on Measure G
Below is a letter to the editor I wrote (the local paper didn’t publish it). Just to be clear, a “No” vote means you don’t support dam removal, and the Supes are hoping to use an overwhelmingly “No” vote to springboard a later (and expensive) lawsuit.
Yes Vote on Measure G Means Jobs
With Siskiyou County’s economy faltering and unemployment near 20%, it’s hard to understand why the Siskiyou County Board of Supervisors are so rabidly opposed to the recovery of Klamath River salmon and steelhead – especially given the huge economic stimulus that dam removal and the Klamath Basin Restoration Agreement (KBRA) would bring.
Independent economic analysis says dam removal and habitat improvement projects would lower unemployment, provide sustainable tourism-related jobs, and result in lower power rates (compared to retrofitting the dams to current standards).
Also, the KBRA’s adaptable flow regimes offer us water for salmon and water for farmers, who need some idea what they’re getting so they can plan ahead (many are also getting way-below-market-price power too).
Tellingly, the Board of Supervisors have repeatedly called for in-depth studies of the effects of dam removal, yet they’re now asking citizens to make up their mind before the asked-for studies have been completed.
Simply put, they’re hoping to use an overwhelming “No” vote to springboard this county into an expensive lawsuit which we can’t afford – and will delay the jobs this county so desperately needs.
Returning the Klamath to a healthy state delivers many economic benefits to Siskiyou County – including to our vital (and wholly sustainable) tourism industries. After all, once they stopped shipping all of Northern California’s water south out of the Trinity River, the steelhead and salmon runs came back strong, and on some weekends, you can’t find a place to park along the river.
Those who want you to vote “No” on Measure G will tell you the dams provide irrigation water and flood control, yet they don’t.
Instead, they offer us terrible water quality (the Klamath runs pea green with toxic algae every summer), and because they’d cost us power users $500 Million to retrofit yet only $200 Million to remove, we’re simply better off without them, and in almost every way possible.
Please vote “Yes” on Measure G. Our local economy will thank you for it.
Note to the Board Of Supervisors
Turns out salmon restoration – and a healthy river – actually creates jobs. To see how, watch the video below from Chelan County, WA.
And – Siskiyou County’s Board of Supervisors take note – the restoration actually helps the local economy.
Located in Central Washington State, Chelan County residents have long enjoyed the bounty of their regions natural resources. But since the late 1950′s, they have seen their salmon populations all but disappear. Rallying around this urgent cause, communities throughout Central Washington are now setting an example for the world on how to work collaboratively in addressing salmon recovery.
WINNER: First Place – Stories From Our Watersheds film contest. Hosted by the Whole Watershed Restoration Initiative. ecotrust.org/​wwri
PRESS: “Stories from the North Cascades: Flying for Fish” Published by experiencewilderness.org (experiencewilderness.org/​my-north-cascades-story/​flying-fish)






























Great video, I wonder if the local politicians took the time to watch it. The long term jobs created by the restoration far outway the short term jobs of the dam decommissioning. Oh, and its the right thing to do. Rivers are only rivers when they run free.
Rockman
Will(Quote)
Don’t worry, this silly little vote won’t have a single impact on the dam removal. Unless PPL gets a big tax payer funded dam removal bond passed (not likely) the dam ain’t coming out. And PPL gets to defy various enviro laws (like the Clean Water Act) for the next 10 years thanks to the gutless negotiations by the various conservation groups on the KBRA which gives PPL the “right” to continue the status quo for the next 10 years. By then, there won’t be any salmon left, but it doesn’t really matter because the dam ain’t coming down either.
modelingbob(Quote)
“Reuniting a River”, a blissful, heartening piece, ran in the December 2008 National Geographic. Introduction- “After fighting for years over its water, farmers, Indiana, and fishermen are joining forces to let the troubled Klamath River run wild again.”
Uh huh.
Sadly I have to agree with modelingbob on this one- the Klamath Basin is cursed forever by selfish narrow greed.
PERSPECTIVE ADJUSTER- why doesn’t anyone embroiled in this sordid mess ever notice how much water gets diverted from the Trinity every year- irretrievably bound for agriculture outside of the Klamath? Hint, it will make you fret less about the potato farmers in Oregon.
Sully(Quote)
I’m no fan of the KRBA agreement (feels like Christmas 24/365 for the upper Klamath irrigators), but I’m more hopeful about dam removal than you kids are.
Measure G is another black-helicopter-level attempt by the Supes to jump-start a lawsuit against removal; if they get an overwhelmingly “no” vote the lawsuit becomes a lot easier).
And even if dam removal isn’t imminent, nothing good is going to come of Measure G, and a “Yes” vote would tend to stifle this little avenue of stupidity, the marketing of which (on the “No” side) has pretty much run the usual gamut of lies, fear mongering and other nasty stuff.
I can’t affect most other aspects of this mess, but I do have something to say about Measure G…
Tom Chandler(Quote)
I honestly believe the exact opposite that the dams are coming out. It may take ten years but they will come out. PP is already charging its rate payers in all of OR to remove them. They are a liability to the company. Vote Y on G and have a little optimism, this is the biggest dam removal project most likely in US history. These things take time and everyone who follows water in the West is watching. If this is done right with support and the farmers stay in business and the dams come down, we may have something. Please stay positive on this because like many people I love to catch fish and have healthy rivers, but I also know where my potatoes come from…….Compromise…..Tell your Friends to Vote Yes on G.
dwayne(Quote)