A week ago I wrote about fly fishing a little alpine creek that was glorious in the spring, but threadbare and fly-ridden at the end of summer – courtesy the cattle that had grazed it bare.
At least Stream Y had only been denuded of its greenery; Singlebarbed’s now-famous “Little Stinkin’” river has been stripped of its water(courtesy an irrigation district), and yesterday he visited it again in the hopes of finding a little wet stuff in the streambed.
What he found instead would make any fishermen throw back his head and howl at the moon:
Dead and desiccated beaver were scattered near their burrows. While agile underwater they’re clumsy prey on dry land, easy pickings for coyotes or someone’s Rottweiler.
The pelts were too far gone for my road kill honed reflexes, and I left them for the buzzards.
Even the deep stretches were dry, at best with a bit of dampened mud at the bottom. No fish carcasses were evident but they would’ve been picked clean and skeletal.
It’s a complete wipe. Bugs dead, fish dead, and the wildlife in the area foraging for water as best they can. I found a couple muddy traces that had an inch of water remaining, and the volume of animal tracks nearby were moot testimony to the deer, coyotes, and birds having to make do.
It’s a riveting post, thought not a manifestly happy one. It’s tempting to shrug it off as an isolated incident, but it’s not.
In fact, it’s potentially more a model of California’s water future than elegant-yet-ugly essay.
With Big Ag drumming up support on the back of a string of lies about unemployment, what’s causing that unemployment, and the negligible effects of a short-term halt in pumping from the Delta, it appears that California’s prevailing sentiment about water has swung toward the “dry ‘em up” side of the pendelum.
California – one of the most hyrdologically altered landscapes on the planet – is now in the grip of a drought, but it’s also witness to a war being waged for the stuff that runs in its veins.
While the media largely buys the spin offered up by those profiting from the taxpayer’s largess, the California Delta’s ecology remains in free fall, and politicos seemingly can’t hand out the corporate welfare checks fast enough.
Now – with new water “storage” and “conveyances” planned (at taxpayer expense), and a growing sense that any trickle of water that makes it to the ocean is wasted – we’re witness to what may be the last call for any sizable populations of salmon & steelhead in this state.
It’s grim and getting grimmer, and because he sums it up better than I can, I’ll let Singlebarbed wrap it up for us:
Something stinks, and it’s not the corpse of my creek. She smells of hot rock and a few posies … all that remains.




























Unlike many places, our State has a lot of water at certain times of the year (winter). Our demand for that water is at a different time of year (summer). Dams and canals were built to cure this asynchronous situation, without much regard for the environment. Now (in addition to conservation, marketing, and raising prices for users) we need to modify some of the plumbing so that it can be operated in a more flexible and sensitive way.
By the same token, we have a population that lives on the arid coast, because that is where the seaports and airports are. Either we get water to those folks, or they move to Redding. Which would you prefer?
We can’t pretend it is 1848. Some pretty thoughtful folks have moved beyond the “All Projects Are Bad” mindset. At least give them a listen.
Philip(Quote)
Sounds reasonable, but it ignores the reality of our current situation – and the current crop of water “reform” bills being considered by the legislature.
You speak to residential use, but agricultural uses comprise 70-80% of the state’s developed water, and that’s what this whole mess is really all about.
Move everyone to Redding? That’s a strawman, and not worth commentary.
Instead, let’s recognize a few facts.
First, the state’s already admitted it’s promised 8X more Delta water than is available, and any peripheral canal isn’t going to change that.
When will see water users face that awful truth?
And let’s also eliminate any niggling questions about the purpose of a new peripheral canal; the expert group that suggested the canal mandated an independent council be created that would protect the Delta from diversions, yet in Ahhnold’s final version, that independent control is gone.
There’s little question why; the peripheral canal is being created to more effectively rob the Delta of its water – continuing the estuary’s ecological free fall – and send more water to agriculture (free of the minimal pumping constraints currently placed on them).
You’ve appeared here and made several entreaties based on reasonable reform to protect residential use, yet the maddening truth lies elsewhere; little of this is concerned with SoCal residential water, and everything is about another Great Big Water Grab.
Here’s a passage from the LA Times which calls a spade a spade, identifying the latest round of goodies as little more than more money for ag:
You’re right – we can’t pretend it’s 1848. We can’t pretend that pumping water from the Delta at record-breaking levels for the last five years didn’t somehow contribute to the collapse of the salmon (and the economic collapse that went with it).
We also can’t pretend that the issue now is simply one of utilization – not if we expect the Delta to survive.
We should wake up to the fact that Big Ag is about to grab even more water without making any commitments at all to conserve – and this on the backs of a minimum of a $54 Billion dollar gift from the taxpayers.
That, my friend, is business as usual in California, and many thoughtful people were hoping for more. It doesn’t appear we’re going to get it.
Tom Chandler(Quote)
The purpose of the PC and perhaps a couple of other off-stream storage facilities is to permit pumping at the time it is least disruptive, and to allow the pumping to be reduced or halted at times it would be most damaging. Of course, it could be operated in a horrible way that would make everything worse than it is, but so can the existing facilities. Just as you can use your car to drive your wife to the emergency room, or to mow down the kiddies in the Easter parade. BTW I’m not sure your statement that the last 5 years have had record exports from the Delta; what has really increased are both legal and illegal in-Delta pumping, a lot of which is not screened. And there’s a heck of a lot wrong with the Delta that the pumping has nothing to do with.
There needs to be a proper economic study of the value (or lack thereof) gained by having *any* delta exports. It could well be that we’d all be better off with no exports, but it is going to take a lot of leadership and re-arrangement to get most Californians to believe it. In the meantime, if there is a catastrophic levee failure, nobody will give a rat’s ass about the Delta or the fish. They will dig and pump, pronto.
Of course my comment about people moving to Redding was rhetorical, but we have to accept that most of our population and economic activity is centered in the arid parts of the state. There’s here, they’re queer (some, anyway) and they ain’t going away.
Now let’s go fishing.
Philip(Quote)
Just not in that creek, right?
strategery(Quote)