Snowshoeing For Trout (Or, Never Take Phone Calls In the Winter)
By Tom Chandler on Jan 10, 2008 in Fishing Report, Upper Sacramento
When life gives you lemons, you make lemonade.
When life gives you several feet of snow, you employ the same principle; you make a snowshoe trip to some of your favorite trout water.

I don’t know if Edmondson was fishing or praying for trout. Votes?
With cabin fever setting in all over the area, finding a pair of accomplices was easy. I called Edmondson, he picked up the phone, and I said “You up for doing something supremely stupid?”
“Absolutely” he said.
Wayne Eng fell for pretty much same line, which suggests an advanced case of snowstorm fever.
Thus, we found ourselves parked at a snow berm, shouldering packs and strapping on showshoes for the one-mile walk into our target pool.
At first, the going was easy; a snowmobile had compacted a trail in the snow, and the walking was steeply downhill. Later, we left the snowmobile track and started plowing through drifts a couple feet deep, which elevated the trip from fly fishing trip to aerobic fly fishing trip.
(I discovered the real distinction between the two the next morning.)

Though trout are waiting for us down there, first, a picture.
Naturally, our first spot didn’t produce anything — fish, rising fish or even bugs. After mucking around, we packed up yet again and headed to another spot.
There, we found a few trout lazily sipping BWOs — slow, maddening rises to a very sparse hatch.
I got one to eat a Sully tied emerger, and the fish turned out to be exactly one inch longer than Dave Edmondson’s landing net (I’m guessing 15″-16″).

The standard Underground Trout portrait.
We took turns fishing our one run, and Wayne hooked one that flashed some extraordinary color before coming loose, and Dave Edmondson had two takes, but never got a hook in either.
Frankly, the trout was a bonus; fishing a river where you’re dodging the ice chunks floating by — a snow-silenced river that hasn’t seen a single footprint in at least several days — is pretty cool shit all by itself.

As if fly fishers didn’t already carry enough gear.
And basically, I lied in the above paragraph. Catching the trout was cool — and a lot more fun than the hourlong hump up the hill in snowshoes.
Trout function in water that’s only a few BTUs above ice cube-hood, an amazing reality in itself, and they’re damned picky when the river’s that low and clear.
Catching them in winter is far from a certainty, and if the reward wasn’t in the trying, there’d be a lot fewer fly fishermen.
The walk out was a bit of grind, though not enough of one to stop me from planning a similar trip — to another snowed-in part of the river — in the near future.

Snow started falling again on our walk out, which wasn’t easy, but it was stunning.
Fly fishing in winter is a bigger logistical challenge than summer; you’re often carrying fewer flies, but a lot more gear designed to keep you warm in some truly inhospitable conditions.
Getting around in deep snow fires up the metabolism, but the last thing you want is to overheat and start sweating profusely. The second you stop — presumably stepping into a river of heat-sucking water — your body temperature plummets.
Thus, you have to carry enough clothing to balance the two activities, which probably means a daypack, and maybe a 3-5 piece travel rod.
Naturally, there’s more winter fishing to come. And just as naturally, you’ll hear about it here.
See you on snowshoes, Tom Chandler.
Technorati Tags: fly fishing,fishing,fly rod,trout,rainbow trout,upper sacramento,upper sacramento river,upper sac,snow shoes









Smellslikefish | Jan 10, 2008 | Reply
Net = 15″
Surprisingly, I’m not suffering much today, as I thought would. Don’t take this to mean that I can be talked into another such adventure as easily. Okay, I probably can.
Meanwhile, I’ll be pricing snow-mobiles…
Tom Chandler | Jan 10, 2008 | Reply
OK. 16″ it is.
kbarton10 | Jan 10, 2008 | Reply
I see this akin to binge drinking, the first post full of enthusiasm, followed days later by the second - complaining about aches, pains, and flu …
You’d think he’d figure it out by now.
Sully | Jan 10, 2008 | Reply
Combining over-snow transport with fishing IS great fun. Used to skinny-ski to the Sweetwater Hole -so named because it is situated immediately below the sewage plant- on the Blue River below Silverthorne. The warmed water there led to consistent midge hatches all winter.
Alex | Jan 10, 2008 | Reply
Looks like a hell of a way to shake off the shack nasties!
You use a W30 for your pics, right? What settings are you using on the fish faces, they look great!
wayne eng | Jan 11, 2008 | Reply
Tom,Dave….Why dont we dangle a steak in front of Wally the wonder dogs nose then he could pull us up the hill with his tail ?
Lou | Jan 11, 2008 | Reply
Isn’t the weather really better for sitting by a fire listening to Jimmy Buffet’s “Boat Drinks”? If you must go out in that stuff, at least load that one on your iPod.
Tom Chandler | Jan 11, 2008 | Reply
Alex: I typically use an older W10. The trick is to be aware of your light source; you want to avoid glare that washes out the colors. Sometimes a little fill flash helps (others, it hurts).
Wayne: The Wonderdog isn’t very smart, but he’s smarter than that (ask me how I know). Sadly.
Lou: You need something with a bit more “bite” to get you up that hill. Maybe Quadraphenia by the Who.
taku | Jan 11, 2008 | Reply
Ah, but if you keep it up, think of the aerobic animal you will be next summer to get into all those deep canyons and high alpine lakes that all the couch potatoes can’t.
Sweet, sweet, suffering……
icefishingpro.com | Jan 13, 2008 | Reply
Snoweshoing is an awesome way of travelling but i’ll agree that after a little while it begins to get painful. I barely even bother anymore because there is rerely any snow deep enough for me to need my snowshoes.
Adam | Jan 14, 2008 | Reply
Out here in Virginia, the brook trout stremas are finally getting enough water for fishing. Unfortunately most of the larger trout were killed off in the summer drought.
In other news, I got back from the trip to Baja. Someone here told me I should bring a 10. I brought an 8. The 10 probably would have been better! I caught a Jack Crevalle. The only other fly-fisher I saw broke a 9 weight spey rod fighting what appeared to be a rooster.
Tom Chandler | Jan 14, 2008 | Reply
taku: But I’m already an animal. At least that’s what the L&T says, and I’m choosing to interpret it in the best possible sense.
ice: Can’t get around on my own property without snowshoes at the moment, but long hikes are misery.
Adam: Think I asked you if the 8wt was enough after being tipped off by Underground Saltwater Correspondent Jim Troyer that a 10 is better in Baja since you never really know what you’re going to get.
wayne eng | Jan 14, 2008 | Reply
Adam….That rooster must have been one Big Chicken.