Current Article

Lower Sacramento River Drift Boats Bouncing Off Construction Pilings Like Pinballs

Ok, the headline is alarmist. I mean, I basically lied to get your attention. So far, it looks like only one drift boat hit a temporary construction piling under Redding’s Cypress Avenue bridge, but there have been close calls — enough that:

Shasta County Sheriff Tom Bosenko says he may restrict or even close the Sacramento River under Reddings Cypress Avenue Bridge after reports that boaters are running into construction pilings sprouting up in the busy waterway.

Anyone suspect (like me) that Bosenko doesn’t fly fish? Later in the article…

Linnea LeBoeuf, who co-owns local guide service River Romance with her husband, Todd, said one of her oarsmen was taking clients on a romantic float trip down the river, when the drift boat struck a bridge piling. The collision dented the rear of the boat and cracked an oar.

A romantic float trip? If it’s one thing we’ve learned reading thousands of romance novels watching hours of manly action movies, it’s that a hint of danger transforms the ordinary into the saucy. Trust us on this one.

Sadly, the guys at the Redding Fly Shop don’t seem nearly as romantic:

At the Fly Shop, which houses the Redding area’s largest fly fishing guide service, Guide Services Director Michael Caranci said he’s heard of at least a half-dozen similar close calls.

“It’s a tight enough passageway that there’s very little room for error,” Caranci said.

How tight is it (you ask in unison)?

Although an average drift boat is about 23 feet wide from oar tip to oar tip, boaters will have just 20 feet to pass between the two platforms.

Twenty feet? My guide friend Dave Roberts would laugh in a bitter and cynical fashion if you told him he was in danger because he had to shoot a 20 foot gap, but OK — given Lower Sac water velocities, let’s just say it’s dangerous.

Closing the river? Ouch. (Once more in unison, Redding Area Tourist Economy — OUCH).

Signs since have been placed at boat ramps and around town warning boaters of the dangers.

The sheriff’s office also has discussed contacting private landowners with access to the river to see if they’ll allow boaters to pull out prior to reaching the bridge, Starman said.

But that’s not enough for Caranci, who says the perils should have been considered and corrected before construction began. He said the potential dangers have been scaring fishermen off the river.

“The city messed up in terms of the recreation value of the river,” he said. “They didn’t take that into consideration when they started this project.”

City tourism officer Bob Warren said any closure to the river could hurt Redding’s economy.

He estimated at least $1 million a year pours into the community because of fishing on the river.

I’d guess City Tourism Officer Bob Warren is way, way under with that $1 million a year estimate (which is probably why the city didn’t consider the recreation angle in the first place).

Given the number of guide trips supported by the Lower Sac — not to mention a big, big dollar fly shop, the hotels, meals, etc — the number has to be higher.

Any Undergrounders been through the construction pilings lately? I’d love to hear your take.

You can read the whole Record Searchlight article here: Narrow access: River construction sandbags access to the Sacramento River

5 Comment(s)

  1. KW Morrow | Nov 1, 2007 | Reply

    This guy obviously doesn’t know how to calculate total economic impact. I’d bet the DIRECT economic impacts are about 5 times higher than his $1 million guesstimate. What a rube!

    According to the state estimates, the economic impact value of ONE Sacramento River salmon lies between $600 and $1,100. While trout values would be somewhat lower, they won’t be less than about 1/2. Multiply that by the # of fish taken annually and then divide by the Redding area’s percentage of the total Sacramento River and you get a fair ballpark number of the economic impact for Redding…in 1998 dollars! And that is only recreational fishing. Somehow, I doubt that’s the only recreational boating taking place on the river in that area. After all, there are those romantic float trips to consider. LOL

  2. Tom Chandler | Nov 1, 2007 | Reply

    Honestly, this is such an odd mistake on the part of the “tourism director” that you have to wonder if he was misquoted, or is simply related to someone.

  3. Dave Neal | Nov 1, 2007 | Reply

    Yeah I just heard about this from a local guide. The “man” is really are considering closing sections of the river…the Trinity is already way too crowded…way…way…too crowded. Now all the Lower Sac potential will just head over there too!? Yikes. Bummer.

    I also heard the pounding vibrations are causing severe reverberation (sp?) and freaking out the salmon and giving trout major headaches.

  4. Steve Ray | Feb 16, 2008 | Reply

    I’ve been through the construction pilings a couple times with a driftboat. It’s not a big deal, just point the bow downstream and ride the current through.

  5. Tom Chandler | Feb 17, 2008 | Reply

    Steve: The folks I’ve spoken to suggest that’s true now, but that the thing will get pretty dangerous at the high flows of summer, what with the current running at an angle to the opening.

2 Trackback(s)

  1. From accutane class action » Lower Sacramento River Drift Boats Bouncing Off Construction … | Nov 1, 2007

  2. From Lower Sacramento River Drift Boats Bouncing Off Construction Pilings Like Pinballs | Fishing made easy | Nov 2, 2007

Post a Comment

  • Underground Google

  • Our Affiliates

    Sierra Trading Post

    Click, shop, and help pay our costs. Thanks!

  • Reading

  • Who's Visiting?

  • Admin